Independent heavy music culture - Est. 2013

DoomnationRadio

Radio and magazine

Doom metal radio and an independent magazine for heavy music, cinema, literature, and art.

Doom Cinema

Clay and Kabbalah: Der Golem (1920)

Paul Wegener's Der Golem does not adapt Gustav Meyrink's novel. It reworks the older Prague legend into a story of persecution, protection, and delegated power, while Hans Poelzig and Marlene Moeschke turn the ghetto itself into an unstable body built around the creature.

· By Lihi Laszlo

On October 29, 1920, the day Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam premiered at Berlin’s Ufa-Palast am Zoo, Paul Wegener explained where his Golem had come from. He told Film-Kurier that he had known the story since childhood, had first encountered it somewhere in Heinrich Heine, and had been seized by the image of the silent, enormous servant formed from clay and animated by the Schem, the secret name. After recounting the legend, Wegener added: “That was all the material there was. From that I wrote my Golem.”

Poster for Paul Wegener's 1920 silent film Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam.

That statement matters because Wegener’s film is often placed beside Gustav Meyrink’s enormously successful 1915 novel Der Golem, and the two are easily collapsed into one source. They are not. The Jewish Museum Berlin describes Meyrink’s novel as a grim, psychedelic crime story in which the Golem has only a marginal role, appearing as a ghostly presence in the Prague Jewish Quarter once every thirty-three years. Wegener’s film instead returns to the legend of Rabbi Judah Loew and a clay protector brought to life for a Jewish community under threat. The novel helped popularize the Golem for a broad non-Jewish readership, but the 1920 film does not adapt Meyrink’s plot.

Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (“The Golem: How He Came into the World”) was Wegener’s third screen treatment of the figure. His 1915 Der Golem, made with Henrik Galeen, survives only in fragments; the 1917 comedy Der Golem und die Tänzerin (“The Golem and the Dancing Girl”) does not survive in complete form. The 1920 film is the fullest surviving version and the one that fixed Wegener’s heavy, blunt, almost sculptural Golem in film history. Filmportal credits Wegener as director, with Carl Boese as co-director, Karl Freund as cinematographer, and Hans Poelzig among the principal designers.

The story is set in a mythicized sixteenth-century Prague under Emperor Rudolf II, not in the Middle Ages. That distinction is historical even if the film’s Prague is deliberately unreal. Rabbi Loew reads danger in the stars and learns that the Jewish community is to be expelled. He forms a human figure from clay and performs an occult ritual to animate it. The film combines elements associated with the Prague Golem legend with its own expressionist fantasy. Loew summons Astaroth to obtain the life-giving word, and the written Schem is placed in the star-shaped amulet on the Golem’s chest. Removing it returns the creature to inert clay.

The historical Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, who died in 1609, was a major Prague scholar. The famous story that he created a Golem was attached to him much later. The Jewish Museum Berlin notes that the legend was not ascribed to Loew until roughly two centuries after his death and became firmly associated with sixteenth-century Prague around the turn of the twentieth century. Wegener therefore was not reconstructing an authenticated episode from Jewish history. He was filming a modern form of a legend that had already been repeatedly rewritten.

Rabbi Loew and the Golem in Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920).

The ceiling comes down

The film’s central political scene begins with expulsion. The emperor orders the Jews out of Prague, then summons Loew to court. There, Loew presents the history of his people through a magical projection. The courtiers laugh. The palace begins to collapse. The Golem steps forward and holds up the ceiling, saving the ruler and the people who had been mocking the story they were watching. In gratitude, the emperor withdraws the decree.

The scene places Jewish persecution and Jewish rescue inside the same spectacle. The community is endangered by imperial power, then has to save that power in order to obtain permission to remain. A modern historian does not need to pretend the film predicted the Third Reich to see why the material was charged in 1920. German History in Documents and Images points to the post-1918 arrival of Jewish refugees fleeing pogroms in Central and Eastern Europe and to the antisemitic violence that would erupt in Berlin’s Scheunenviertel in 1923. The film’s ghetto was legendary Prague, but persecution was not an antique subject for its first audiences.

Nor is the film’s representation of Jewish life politically simple. It asks the audience to sympathize with a threatened Jewish community, but it also turns Rabbi Loew into astrologer, magician, and necromancer, and builds its Jewish space through exoticized occult imagery. Scholarship on the film has read these elements in sharply different ways. The useful point is to keep the contradiction visible: persecution is condemned while Jewishness is also staged through fantasies produced for a largely non-Jewish mass audience.

After the emperor rescinds the decree, Loew’s task should be complete. The Golem is deactivated. The disaster begins when Famulus, Loew’s assistant, restores the Schem for a private purpose. Jealous of Mirjam’s relationship with the courtier Florian, he uses the community’s protector as an instrument of revenge. The Golem kills Florian, breaks free of the command structure that brought him back to life, and sets Loew’s house ablaze.

Outside the ghetto, the Golem encounters children. A little girl offers him an apple, then reaches for the star-shaped amulet and removes it. The body falls inert. The action is almost absurdly small beside the scale of the creature. The film has spent its running time surrounding animation with stars, incantation, projection, architecture, and ritual; deactivation comes through a child’s curiosity.

The Golem carrying a figure in Paul Wegener's Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920).

A city built for the Golem

Wegener did not want a documentary Prague. In the same 1920 interview, he described Hans Poelzig’s set as a “city-poem,” an architectural paraphrase built to create the atmosphere in which the Golem could breathe. The Jewish Museum Berlin’s reconstruction of the production shows how collaborative that design was. Poelzig developed the exterior architecture; sculptor Marlene Moeschke designed interiors, props, and costumes and later helped construct the physical sets. Their ghetto was three-dimensional, walkable, and deliberately anthropomorphic.

Expressionist architectural set from Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920).

The distinction from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, released the same year, is physical. Caligari famously paints distortion onto flat surfaces. Poelzig and Moeschke make distortion inhabitable. Stairs curl, walls swell, gables rise like flames, and passages narrow bodies into predetermined routes. The Golem is a constructed body moving through a constructed city, and the design lets the same problem of animation operate at two scales. Clay is made to look alive; architecture is made to behave as if it were alive.

Karl Freund’s cinematography completes the effect. Crowds move through the alleys as if the buildings were directing traffic. Bodies are repeatedly framed by doorways, arches, stairs, and walls that deny neutral space. The community does not simply occupy the ghetto. It is organized by it. That makes the film’s obsession with command more than a plot device. Control is built into the frame before the Golem ever receives an order.

The expressionist ghetto set designed for Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920).

The visual achievement was recognized immediately. Contemporary reviews collected by Filmportal repeatedly singled out Poelzig’s architecture and the film’s sculptural power. Modern institutions treat the film as a landmark for the same reason. The Jewish Museum Berlin calls the 1920 production a milestone in horror cinema and credits the Poelzig-Moeschke sets with a fundamental innovation in three-dimensional film design. Its afterlife is documented in archives, restorations, prints, and screenings. No speculative story about why the Nazi regime supposedly chose to preserve it is required.

The monster and the instruction

It is tempting to call the Golem the ancestor of every later robot, artificial human, or cinematic monster. The resemblance can become too convenient. What can be said more securely is that Wegener’s performance gave twentieth-century visual culture one of its most influential images of an artificial humanoid: massive, blunt, obedient until obedience breaks down. The Jewish Museum Berlin emphasizes how strongly Wegener’s three films shaped the later visual idea of the robot-like Golem.

The film itself is less interested in a creature developing an independent moral philosophy than in the transfer of authority. Loew animates the Golem to protect a community. The emperor benefits from that power. Famulus redirects it toward jealousy and revenge. The child removes the mechanism entirely. The same body changes meaning according to who controls the Schem. Protection, spectacle, murder, and inert matter are separated by access to one command system.

This is where the film remains useful beyond its historical setting. German History in Documents and Images reads the Golem story as a warning about the unpredictability of innovation during a period of rapid technological and social change. Doomnation’s narrower reading is about delegated agency: the danger begins when power is built to obey but the authority to direct it moves from one set of hands to another. The problem is not that the Golem secretly possesses the wrong values. The film gives him almost no values at all. The problem is that instructions are never separate from the person who gets to issue them.

That distinction also makes Wegener’s version different from Meyrink’s. Meyrink’s ghostly Golem is a recurring symptom of Prague, a figure that passes through the Jewish Quarter like the return of something the city cannot resolve. Wegener gives the figure a body, a purpose, and a removable mechanism of control. One haunts. The other acts. The shared name connects them, but their functions are different enough that treating the film as an adaptation of the novel erases what each work is actually doing.

Paul Wegener as the Golem in Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam (1920).

The title Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam promises an origin story, but the film’s real achievement is to make origin inseparable from responsibility. Who creates the body, who gives it a purpose, who can redirect it, and who can stop it are four different questions. Wegener’s clay figure survives because the film keeps those questions visibly separate. The Golem may be made from earth, but the danger comes from the hands holding the word.

*

Filmportal: Der Golem, wie er in die Welt kam | Jewish Museum Berlin: Golem from Mysticism to Minecraft